York has it all, so why no World Heritage status?
UNESCO WHS - not an international revival of an old British high street staple but what the city of York has aspired to for decades, UN World Heritage Site status, no less. Things seem to have gone quiet on that front but is the campaign still ongoing? It must be an uphill task.
Maybe York can offer too wide a range of ‘ingredients’. Just look at the recipe. Number one is the Minster for which there’s a significant entry charge unlike UNESCO Durham Cathedral which is free.
In all fairness, the Minster admission can be offset by free entry at the NRM when visitors eventually get there.
Durham Castle has the unfair advantage of having more left of it than its York equivalent. However, York can boast the world’s original medieval street, 'Potter Lane', with all manner of attractions; ghosts, wizards, potions, things that go bump in the night. All good UNESCO stuff.
Public toilets are the talk of the town, and deserving an organised tour. Hotels and student accommodation all roughly the same, presumably built from kits and interchangeable. Let’s not overlook York’s ‘Little Venice’ aka the Foss basin or ‘Tin Can Alley’ in Piccadilly, the bright Spark in York’s crown…enough said!
Probably the greatest concentration of eateries in the world sets York apart. Within the city walls there must be more feeding ‘stations’ than any comparable areas in the country - dare we say ‘world’?
Perhaps York has such an embarrassment of riches that the World Heritage committee simply doesn’t know where to begin, hence the frustratingly protracted delay before recognition. Never mind York; we love you!
Derek Reed
Middlethorpe Drive
York
Recommended reads:
'York's Clifford's Tower mound is an accident waiting to happen - put a fence up'
Why York's Nevil Shute should not be linked to Britain's R101 Airship disaster
Are You Nick? American thanks York stranger for 9/11 call
Calls for fairer York planning decisions and higher tourist tax - letters
Four journeys, four travel nightmares!
I am writing to express my disappointment with the reliability of the UK rail network.
Over the past year, I have travelled by train on four occasions, all at weekends, and every journey has been affected by significant disruption.
My trip to Bath was delayed by six hours due to a broken-down train.
A journey to Plymouth was severely overcrowded on a hot day, with no air conditioning, limited catering facilities, and toilets that were out of order.
My trip to Bristol was delayed by four hours because of an engine fault, and my most recent journey to London was delayed by two hours due to swans on the track.
While the Delay Repay scheme provides some compensation, it does little to make up for the inconvenience, frustration, and disruption caused by these delays. The claims process can often feel almost as frustrating as the delays themselves.
What concerns me most is that every journey I have taken has been impacted by reliability issues. This has left me with little confidence in the rail network and the quality of service being provided. Many trains also appear outdated and are often lacking in basic passenger comfort.
Having travelled extensively by rail across Europe, I have found services there to be generally more reliable, comfortable, and efficient. While no rail system is perfect, the contrast with my experiences in the UK is stark.
Passengers deserve a rail service they can depend on, rather than one where delays and disruption seem to be the norm.
John Jones
Russet House
Birch Close
York
What do you think?
Feel strongly about an issue? Send us a letter. Please write no more than 250 words and you must provide your full name, address and mobile number. Send your views by email to: letters@thepress.co.uk
Share