Report this comment
  • "
    bolero wrote:
    So we're all OK so long as we hold the same views as Angryand Frustrated eh? More frustrated than angry me thinks and no I definitely do not hold the same twisted views in this case. You are twisting everything that anyone else says in order to try and defend your own stupid arguments. They don't stand up I'm afraid. Horses are being sacrificed in order to satisfy the greed of the racing fraternity and shame on you all. 48 horses died so far this year I believe in the pursuit of financial gain not because they were admired for their beauty, or faithfulness. Twist this posting anyway you like AngryandFrustrated but I think you will find yourself in the minority on this one. Aintree is nothing more than a slaughterhouse for beautiful animals.
    I am twisting nothing - I have made it clear that the National should be changed as the loss of horses is unacceptable. I am, however, a realist and there is no possibility either now or in the the near future that horse racing, or indeed the Grand National, will be banned.

    However, I feel very strongly that there are postings on this site today which appear to want to castigate a man the posters have never met and about whom the posters have made assumptions regarding his character and lifestyle from behind the cloak of anonymity - in my world that is on-line bullying.

    Never once have I said I support the racing fraternity, nor have I said that I don't care about the horses that die. However, when someone states, as if it is fact, that they are in it for the prize money, I feel obliged to point out that prize money is not the driving factor in racing. I also feel obliged to point out the inaccuracies about the treatment of horses with broken limbs as that has been used as a further excuse to **** Mr Nelson by.

    I am all for reasoned and lively debate. I couldn't care if people agreed with me or not. I don't however, descend into personal comments and abuse, something that appears all too common on this site, evidenced by your own posting which refers to me being frustrated and as holding "twisted views".

    To twist your posting, as you have invited me to do - Everyone's views are twisted unless they agree with Bolero."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Grand National is daft and I won't return, says devastated owner

According To Pete, ridden by Harry Haynes, pictured winning at Wetherby According To Pete, ridden by Harry Haynes, pictured winning at Wetherby

THE owner of a North Yorkshire horse killed in the Grand National has spoken of his devastation and described the steeplechase as "daft", amid growing calls to ban the race.

Peter Nelson, of Helperby, near Thirsk, said entering According To Pete into the four-and-a-half mile Aintree race had been "a fairytale" but said he would never enter the race again, after his worst fears were realised when the gelding was brought down after jumping Becher's Brook for the second time.

The 11-year-old steeplechaser suffered an untreatable foreleg fracture and, was put down by a vet, as was last month's Cheltenham Gold Cup winner Synchronized, who also suffered a fracture after unseating his rider at the same fence on the first circuit.

Mr Nelson, who runs an MOT garage, said: "I haven't slept and my family is devastated. He was part of the family. He had won £200,000 in prize money, but we loved him as he had such a strong character; he was a lovely horse. When you fed him a couple of polo mints he would go for them and eat the whole packet."

"After the race I lost it in minutes. Everyone in the pub was having a great time watching the race - at the end of the race it was silent and everyone went home.

"People in the village have been very upset. I can't tell you how many cards I've had posted through the letterbox and I've been given flowers and a bottle of wine."

The 71-year-old said after coming from humble beginnings, owning a thoroughbred had been a dream and entering a horse into the Grand National had been a once in a lifetime opportunity to end North Yorkshire's five-decade wait to win the race.

He said: "As a yearling, the gelding loved to jump - we had rails across the paddock and he hiked over the fence. He could jump his way out of anything."

Mr Nelson said he felt According To Pete, who was trained by trainer Malcolm Jefferson, of Norton, and won 11 races including the Rowland Meyrick Chase at Wetherby on Boxing Day, would have had a good chance of winning if he got in front at the first fence.

But he said his main concern had been that the horse made it round the course safely and that winning would have been a bonus.

He said: " If he had won I would have paraded him down the street. But now I will never enter the race again. I know I've had a bad experience, but it's daft, there are 40 horses running and any of them could be brought down at any time, like According To Pete was. You can't make the jumps easier because it is an international race. But two horses were killed and two more are fighting for their lives."

The deaths bring the number of horses killed at the Grand National in the past 50 years to 36. Including Saturday's deaths, 41 horses have been killed on UK racecourses this year.

Two other horses, Killyglen and Weird Al, were receiving veterinary treatment yesterday after falls in the race.

Andrew Tyler, director of Animal Aid, said: "The Grand National is a disgusting and shameful spectacle masquerading as sport. There is nothing sporting about an event that routinely kills so many horses. For anyone who genuinely cares about horses, watching this race was an utterly depressing and melancholy experience."

Julian Thick, managing director of Aintree Racecourse, said: "We are desperately sad at these two accidents and our sympathies are with the connections of both.

"Since last year's race we have made further significant changes to the course and there have been four races run over the course without serious incident since then. After today, we will, as always, be looking at all aspects of this year's race to see how we can improve safety further."

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree